HDS streaming (HTTP dynamic streaming) is a powerful protocol that revolutionized video content distribution by enabling efficient delivery of high-quality streams to users across a variety of devices.
Designed to adapt to varying network conditions, HDS streaming paved the way for a more seamless viewing experience, making it a cornerstone in the evolution of streaming technology.
Streaming protocols such as HDS (HTTP dynamic streaming), MPEG-DASH (dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP), and HLS (HTTP live streaming) provide the building blocks for modern video content distribution.
These protocols are critical for effectively delivering high-quality video to users across a range of devices, regardless of network conditions.
This article explores the evolution of streaming protocols, the role HDS streaming played in shaping them, use cases, limitations, benefits, and how it compares to the standards that dominate today’s market.
HDS streaming (HTTP dynamic streaming) is a protocol developed by Adobe to deliver video content efficiently over the internet. It uses adaptive bitrate streaming technology to dynamically adjust video quality based on the viewer's internet speed and device capabilities, ensuring smooth playback even on fluctuating networks.
The HDS streaming protocol was designed to work seamlessly with Adobe Flash Player, which was once the most popular platform for embedded video streaming.
Although no longer widely used or supported due to the discontinuation of Flash Player in 2020, HDS played a critical role in advancing adaptive streaming technologies. It also influenced the development of modern streaming protocols.
Adaptive streaming was first introduced in the early 2000s and revolutionized the way video was delivered online. Before adaptive streaming, video quality was static, and playback would often buffer on the slower networks at the time.
Adaptive streaming introduced the ability to adjust video quality dynamically based on the user's bandwidth and device performance. It quickly became the industry standard and as more companies adopted it, many new implementations arose to address specific use cases and limitations. These include:
HTTP dynamic streaming was developed by Adobe to integrate with the Adobe Flash Player, which, at the time, was the most widely used embedded video player in the world.
However, like many of the other adaptive streaming options of the time, the dependence on a single platform would lead to its eventual discontinuation. Flash Player was discontinued in 2020 due to an abundance of security vulnerabilities, and better methods for embedded video were introduced that didn't rely on proprietary software/services.
HDS left a lasting mark on the streaming industry. Elements of its design, such as efficient metadata handling and adaptive bitrate delivery, influenced modern protocols like MPEG-DASH. While HDS streaming is no longer a part of contemporary video delivery, its innovations helped shape the adaptive streaming technologies we rely on today.
Adobe's HTTP dynamic streaming (HDS) was designed to optimize video content delivery over the internet, reducing costs while increasing playback quality. There are three core processes that enable this: Fragmentation, Manifest Files, and Adaptive Bitrate Delivery.
To evaluate the advantages and limitations of HDS, it's essential to look at these processes in more detail:
The HDS streaming protocol divides video files into smaller units called fragments. These fragments are typically a few seconds long and form the foundation for adaptive streaming. They enable the video player to handle video delivery in smaller pieces.
Each fragment is encoded and stored separately, allowing the video player to dynamically request and play specific fragments based on the current bandwidth and device performance.
The length of the fragments depends on the use case. For example, live streaming often uses smaller fragments to reduce live stream delays, while on-demand sites make use of larger fragments to increase efficiency.
To further optimize video delivery, fragments can be grouped into segments. Segments represent a continuous list of fragments. Using segments reduces the number of individual files that need to be handled by the video player and the content delivery network (CDN), which makes content delivery faster and reduces the server overhead for the content provider.
Manifest files are XML files that contain all the metadata required by the video player. This metadata is crucial for enabling adaptive bitrate streaming. Key information contained in the manifest file includes:
Manifest files are what enable the video player to understand the video structure and to receive the necessary fragments needed by the user.
Adaptive bitrate streaming (ABR) is a streaming technique that dynamically adjusts video quality during playback based on the user’s available bandwidth, device capabilities, and processing power. This ensures smooth playback with minimal buffering, even under fluctuating network conditions.
ABR operates by storing segment indexes in a manifest file (e.g., an M3U8 file for HLS or an MPD file for MPEG-DASH). Each segment has multiple renditions, which are versions of the same content encoded at different bitrates and resolutions. For instance, one segment may be available in 1080p, 720p, and 480p quality.
During playback, the video player evaluates the user's current network conditions and device performance. It selects the most appropriate rendition of each segment to optimize the viewing experience, seamlessly switching between renditions as conditions change.
While HDS streaming or HTTP dynamic streaming has largely been replaced by modern, platform-independent protocols like HLS and MPEG-DASH, it still offers valuable benefits in certain scenarios. Here’s a closer look at why HDS remains relevant for specific use cases:
HDS streaming allows users to watch real-time video content in different qualities, depending on their current network and device performance. This ensures a smoother streaming experience even on slower networks.
HDS segment and fragment sizes can be adjusted depending on the use case. For example, on-demand video content sites typically use longer fragments and segments to optimize processing overhead. Live streaming websites typically use shorter fragments and segments to reduce live stream delay.
HDS streaming optimizes video delivery by utilizing segment indexes. These indexes help minimize streaming overhead by fetching only the required video fragments, ensuring the best possible quality for the viewer’s network speed without wasting bandwidth.
HDS uses HTTP for video delivery, which allows it to remain functional on a wide range of platforms, even after the discontinuation of Adobe Flash. This makes HDS particularly useful in environments where Flash is no longer supported, but the underlying HTTP-based technology remains in use.
HDS supports DRM (Digital Rights Management) through metadata embedded in manifest files. This helps content creators and providers secure their video streams and prevent unauthorized redistribution, making HDS suitable for protected or premium content delivery.
Content delivery networks can use HTTP caching to store frequently accessed segments on servers separate from the main content server. This can significantly reduce the server load and provide users with faster access to video content through servers closer to their location.
HTTP dynamic streaming (HDS) was a great method for video streaming and paved the road for modern streaming protocols. However, HDS didn’t really improve over time and has since fallen out of use in favor of newer streaming protocols. Here are some of the key limitations of HDS streaming:
Due to the deprecation of Adobe Flash and its support being dropped by modern browsers, the usage of HDS will likely remain on legacy systems that still rely on Flash.
Modern streaming protocols offer far more advanced security features and integration with modern DRM systems. This lack of support makes it a poor choice for “over-the-top” or OTT platforms that rely on high levels of content security.
From the outset, Apple devices never supported HDS, as Apple focused on its own HTTP Live Streaming (HLS) protocol. HLS eventually became an open standard, gaining widespread adoption across devices and platforms. Meanwhile, Adobe ceased updating HDS, allowing HLS to dominate the streaming landscape, especially on Apple devices.
Although the HDS streaming protocol offered notable efficiency and flexibility during its peak in the 2000s, it falls short compared to modern streaming protocols. Newer options like HLS and MPEG-DASH are designed to meet the demands of today’s video content distribution, including higher resolutions and support for advanced web technologies.
HDS’s reliance on Flash limits its ability to integrate with these innovations, making it an impractical choice for scalable, future-ready video delivery.
The lack of updates to Adobe's HTTP dynamic streaming protocol has left it far behind in terms of general features.
Modern video streaming protocols such as HTTP live streaming (HLS) and MPEG-DASH (dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP) offer distinct benefits and features that aren’t available to systems still relying on HDS. Below are some of the most significant ways HDS differs from modern streaming protocols:
HDS streaming relies on Adobe Flash, which has been deprecated and is no longer supported by most modern browsers. Dependence on deprecated software makes the future use of HDS unlikely, with use cases being confined to mainly legacy systems. Furthermore, the lack of HTML5 support and iOS support makes HDS more inefficient in terms of compatibility
While HDS streaming was cutting-edge in the 2000s, it has become obsolete. Modern streaming protocols like HLS and MPEG-DASH provide far more efficient methods for dynamically adjusting video quality during playback.
HDS lacks support for many of the industry-standard encryption methods and DRM tools offered by protocols like HLS. The lack of modern security features is one of the major reasons it’s unsuitable for video content delivery, which is an industry where content privacy is essential.
While HDS streaming does make use of HTTP for content delivery, the implementation has aged over the years and isn’t nearly as efficient as MPEG-DASH or HLS. This issue makes for slower streaming of video content and also gobbles up more server overhead than newer protocols.
HDS played a pivotal role in video content delivery and remains in use on some legacy systems. However, modern-day protocols like HLS and MPEG-DASH offer more robust tooling, current and future compatibility, and better integrations for the modern web.
Due to the discontinuation of Adobe's Flash Player (which HDS streaming relied upon) and the lack of modern features offered by other streaming protocols, the use cases for HDS in 2025 are largely confined to legacy systems and tools that still rely on Flash or HDS in some way.
HTTP Dynamic Streaming (HDS) still serves specific purposes in certain environments. Here are the primary use cases where HDS streaming remains relevant:
HDS is still a viable option for organizations relying on legacy systems that support Adobe Flash. These setups, often used in older corporate networks or educational platforms, benefit from HDS’s compatibility with pre-existing infrastructure. Migrating from HDS to newer protocols may require significant investment, so some systems continue to use HDS streaming for cost-efficiency.
Platforms or services hosting older video libraries encoded in HDS can continue to deliver content efficiently to users with compatible devices. Since HDS supports adaptive bitrate streaming and efficient segment delivery, it can handle archived on-demand content without significant re-encoding.
In closed or controlled environments where modern browser support isn’t a concern, HDS streaming remains a practical option. Examples include internal training systems, corporate video distribution, or private networks where the limitations of Flash are mitigated by the controlled ecosystem.
Some proprietary systems and applications built during HDS’s peak may still depend on its capabilities. In scenarios where these applications remain in use, HDS can be a straightforward and familiar solution for streaming video.
HDS may still be employed in regions where infrastructure upgrades are slower and older technologies like Flash are still in use. In such cases, HDS streaming can serve as a stopgap for video delivery until newer protocols are adopted.
Although HDS is no longer widely supported, it continues to have niche use cases in legacy systems, on-demand archives, and closed networks.
That said, the world is transitioning to online and OTT streaming platforms that require large, scalable, and adaptable systems to succeed. The HDS streaming protocol doesn’t offer the wide reach that modern protocols do and the declining support for Flash creates practical challenges for maintaining these systems.
Newer protocols such as HLS and MPEG-DASH offer much broader compatibility with HTML5 and support more advanced adaptive bitrate streaming on multiple devices. For companies looking to reach a wider audience with their content, transitioning to a modern streaming solution—like those provided by inoRain—is essential for future growth.
As HTTP Dynamic Streaming (HDS) becomes increasingly obsolete due to the discontinuation of Adobe Flash and limited browser support, transitioning to modern protocols like HLS (HTTP Live Streaming) or MPEG-DASH is essential for keeping up with evolving streaming standards.
Here’s how to approach this transition effectively:
Before transitioning, assess your existing infrastructure to determine compatibility with modern protocols. Identify systems, software, and workflows that rely on the HDS streaming protocol. This evaluation will help you understand the scope of changes required, such as upgrading encoding tools, storage configurations, and content delivery mechanisms.
HDS content is typically stored in formats compatible with Adobe Flash. To migrate, video libraries may need to be re-encoded into formats supported by modern protocols. Both HLS and MPEG-DASH support adaptive bitrate streaming and can handle high-quality video, making them ideal for future-proofing your content.
During the transition, it can be helpful to implement a multi-protocol streaming strategy. By simultaneously offering HDS, HLS, and MPEG-DASH, you can ensure compatibility with older systems while introducing support for modern devices and browsers. This approach minimizes service disruptions and allows for gradual adoption.
Cloud-based solutions offer scalable tools for transitioning away from HDS. Many Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) provide built-in support for HLS and MPEG-DASH, as well as tools for re-encoding content, managing adaptive streams, and distributing video to global audiences. Using these services can simplify the transition process.
Modern protocols provide opportunities to enhance your streaming capabilities:
Ensure your technical team is trained to manage and operate the new protocols. Modern streaming workflows may involve new tools, encoding settings, and monitoring systems that differ significantly from those used with HDS.
Run test streams using modern protocols to identify and resolve any potential issues before fully migrating. Testing ensures compatibility with devices, browsers, and networks, providing a seamless experience for end users.
By moving from HDS to modern protocols like HLS or MPEG-DASH, you gain:
Transitioning from HDS to a modern streaming solution involves several challenges but has become increasingly necessary as HDS support continues to dwindle. Legacy systems that rely on HTTP dynamic streaming (HDS) often require significant reengineering to integrate new streaming protocols such as HLS (HTTP Live Streaming) or MPEG-DASH.
With over 20 years of expertise in video content distribution, inoRain is uniquely positioned to assist businesses in transitioning from the HDS streaming protocol to modern streaming technologies. Our team offers expert support and fully customized solutions, ensuring a smooth shift to advanced streaming methods that meet the specific needs of each and every client.
At inoRain, we specialize in building and optimizing OTT platforms, the modern alternative to traditional media services like satellite and cable TV.
Transitioning to modern streaming methods gives companies the opportunity to reach a wider audience. Modern streaming protocols and platforms offer the flexibility and scalability needed to succeed in the dynamic, fast-paced industry of online video content distribution.
inoRain offers budget-friendly plans tailored to match each client's specific needs. Our team of seasoned experts have helped countless companies worldwide make a successful transition to a large-scale online platform as evidenced by our case studies and client testimonials.
Some of the standout features and services we provide include:
Whether you're launching an OTT platform for the first time or upgrading an existing one, inoRain delivers the expertise and resources needed to succeed in the competitive online video market. By offering scalable, budget-friendly solutions, we empower businesses to reach new heights in audience engagement and revenue generation.
As legacy systems like the HDS streaming protocol fade into obsolescence, the shift to modern protocols such as HLS and MPEG-DASH is becoming essential. These advanced solutions provide the scalability, security, and compatibility required to thrive in today’s fast-paced digital landscape, where audience expectations and technology are almost always evolving.
For platforms still relying on HDS, making the transition to a modern protocol unlocks numerous benefits, including improved performance, broader audience reach, and future-proofed content delivery systems.
With the right guidance, this shift can be seamless and highly rewarding.
By partnering with inoRain, you gain access to expert support, innovative solutions, and a proven track record of success.
Ready to make the move from HDS streaming? Contact our experts to get the tools and expertise you need to thrive in the competitive streaming industry!
Adobe's HTTP dynamic streaming (HDS) protocol was one of the first large-scale adaptive bitrate streaming protocols. It allowed seamless playback of high-quality video content by splitting videos into fragments and segments. As such, bandwidth usage was more efficient, and buffer times were drastically reduced. However, due to the deprecation of Adobe Flash, usage of HDS is dwindling and newer protocols like MPEG-DASH now dominate the market.
Adobe developed HDS to work with Adobe Flash. This requirement, alongside outdated features and numerous security vulnerabilities found in Flash, has led to a general decline in the usage of HDS streaming. Modern protocols like HLS and MPEG-DASH offer access to newer tools and better content security methods, to name just a few of the benefits.
Manifest files store metadata about a video. This metadata includes different quality levels, called renditions and segment indexes, to support multiple quality levels on different devices as needed.
inoRain provides expert assistance to platforms still using HDS streaming, helping them transition seamlessly to modern streaming protocols. With decades of experience in the industry, inoRain offers tailored solutions that align with each client’s unique requirements.
Beyond initial migration support, inoRain provides ongoing technical assistance and 24/7 customer service. This means businesses can operate without interruptions as they adapt to advanced streaming technologies.
Co-founder / CTO
Armen Hakobyan is the Co-founder and CTO of inoRain. With extensive experience in digital streaming technology, he contributes insightful articles on AVOD, SVOD, and OTT strategies. Armen also consults with clients to increase their income. His expertise helps shape inoRain's end-to-end solutions for diverse digital content providers.
Loading...
Learn how to live stream an event with the right planning, equipment, and monetization strategies to reach wider audiences and boost your online presence.
Compare RTMP vs. RTSP to find the best streaming protocol for high-quality video delivery! Learn their differences, strengths, and ideal use cases.
Learn about HDS streaming, its role in video content distribution, its benefits, limitations, and how it compares to modern streaming protocols like HLS.